This blueprint is for P&C teams who need PAS Proof Of Concept Scorecard Template to double as an internal working document—not a marketing PDF. Practical buyer guide for PAS Proof Of Concept Scorecard Template with evaluation criteria, risk checks, and shortlist workflow for P&C teams.
How to use this guide: Treat it as a working playbook. Assign section owners, attach evidence (screenshots, API specs, SOC reports, runbooks) to each checklist row, and re-score monthly through selection. Where third-party statistics appear, use them as directional industry context—always reconcile to your own filings, loss triangles, and experience studies.
Executive summary
- PAS Proof Of Concept Scorecard Template should reduce selection risk by forcing shared definitions, evidence, and accountability across business, technology, and finance.
- Buyers fail when they score demos instead of operating truth—this blueprint weights evidence over narrative.
- The highest ROI work happens before the RFP: cohort metrics, integration maps, and legal boundary on data.
- Treat vendor claims as hypotheses until validated in your environment with logging and finance reconciliation.
- Success is a signed decision memo with dissent documented, not unanimous slide approval.
Industry context (how to anchor numbers responsibly)
- Regulatory reporting in U.S. P&C is structured around statutory financials and market conduct expectations coordinated through NAIC-aligned frameworks—your benchmarks should ultimately reconcile to your own statutory and management reporting, not a vendor slide.
- Industry education (for example, III explainers) helps align non-technical stakeholders on vocabulary (combined ratio, loss reserve development, expense ratio) before you debate platform choices.
- When vendors cite "industry averages," demand the cohort definition (personal vs commercial, country, line, company size) and refuse unmatched comparisons.
Stakeholder matrix (who must sign what)
| Role | Primary accountability | Sign-off artifact |
|---|---|---|
| Sponsor (COO/CIO) | Scope, success measures, budget | One-page charter |
| Product / LOB | Workflow truth, edge cases | Process maps + sample transactions |
| Enterprise architecture | Integration patterns, events, APIs | Context diagrams + NFR matrix |
| Actuarial / pricing | Rating integrity, filing touchpoints | Dependency map to filing systems |
| Claims / SIU | Operational KPIs, fairness | Alert disposition SOP + KPI definitions |
| Finance | TCO, capitalization, allocations | Model + sensitivity tables |
| Legal / compliance | Data use, filings, producer rules | Issue list with owners |
| Procurement | commercial structure, SLAs | Redlined baseline contract |
Blueprint execution phases (0–180 days)
| Phase | Days | Outcomes | Proof artifacts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 — Frame | 0–14 | Problem statement, metric definitions, legal boundary | Signed charter, data inventory |
| 1 — Baseline | 15–45 | Current-state KPIs, leakage assumptions | Dashboard screenshots, SQL definitions |
| 2 — Design | 46–90 | Target operating model, vendor shortlist criteria | Workshop notes, weighted scorecard |
| 3 — Prove | 91–150 | PoC on masked production slice | Test plan, defect log, fairness review |
| 4 — Decide | 151–180 | Board-ready recommendation | Risk register, TCO, implementation plan |
Policy administration blueprint (lifecycle truth)
| Lifecycle stage | Proof artifact | Common gap |
|---|---|---|
| Quote | Stored rating call + eligibility decision | Hidden manual overrides |
| Bind | Coverage object + documents + audit | Incomplete party roles |
| Endorsement | OOS handling + proration rules | Spreadsheet sidecars |
| Cancel / reinstate | Statutory timing + refund math | State-by-state drift |
| Renewal | Non-renew reasons + notices | Batch errors near deadline |
Expanded PAS diligence checklist
- Out-of-sequence endorsements with audit trail on every field change.
- API-first read/write for every object the digital channel needs.
- Bulk processing SLAs for renewals and mass endorsements.
- Configuration promotion pipeline (dev → test → prod) with segregation of duties.
- Migration reconciliation: policy count, premium, and exposure by cohort.
- Document assembly lineage tied to coverage version.
- Billing interface for earned premium timing vs policy effective dates.
- Producer licensing and appointment checks in workflow, not nightly batch only.
- Multi-entity support for program and carrier structures.
- Reporting extracts that match finance close without manual adjustments.
Quantification playbook (build your own statistics)
Use this sequence so every chart in your steering deck is defensible:
- Define the numerator and denominator in SQL (not in slides).
- Freeze a cohort (accident year / report year / close date—pick one and document).
- Compare to a control (prior year same quarter, or matched control cells).
- Publish confidence intervals when sample sizes are small (specialty lines).
- Reconcile to finance (loss payments, case reserves, IBNR movements) quarterly.
| Artifact | Minimum frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Data quality report | Weekly during PoC, monthly in BAU | Data engineering |
| Model performance drift | Monthly | Model risk |
| Alert disposition audit | Weekly | SIU operations |
| Regulatory mapping | Per release | Compliance |
Master blueprint checklist (assign owners + dates)
Governance
- Single RACI across business, IT, security, legal, and procurement.
- Decision log with dissent captured for major architecture choices.
- Change-advisory path for production releases with named approvers.
Evidence binder
- Data dictionary for every field used in executive or regulatory reporting.
- Lineage from source system → integration → warehouse → dashboard.
- Versioned requirements with traceability to test cases.
- Archived PoC artifacts (configs, logs, scorecards) for 24+ months.
Operations
- SLA tables for critical workflows with breach escalation.
- Runbooks for vendor outage, data feed failure, and degraded mode.
- Quarterly operational review with finance reconciliation.
- Capacity plan for peak seasonality (renewals, cat, month-end close).
Security
- Segregation of duties for production access and privileged operations.
- Penetration test scope includes integrations and partner connections.
- Secrets rotation and key management reviewed with cloud security.
Finance
- TCO model includes license, infra, internal FTE, and partner services.
- Capitalization policy aligned with engineering deliverables.
- Sensitivity tables for adoption, discount rate, and maintenance creep.
Procurement
- Pass/fail NFR matrix (latency, throughput, resilience, support).
- Exit clauses for missed milestones or repeated SLA breaches.
- Benchmark clause tying roadmap claims to documented releases.
Vendor demo and workshop prompts
Ask vendors to show, not tell:
- "Walk us from raw event ingestion to explainable reason codes on a masked claim identical to our complexity."
- "Demonstrate rollback of a model version in production without losing audit trail."
- "Provide the last three customer-impacting incidents and MTTR."
- "Show how you separate training data from production feedback loops to prevent leakage."
- "What is your minimum annual professional services load for our book size—and why?"
Source and evidence standard (CoverHolder)
CoverHolder publishes founder-verified vendor facts where available and otherwise treats vendor pages as navigation, not endorsements. For your internal board pack:
- Prefer primary sources (vendor docs, release notes, contracts, SOC2/ISO reports) over analyst quotes.
- Label assumptions explicitly when evidence is incomplete.
- Avoid definitive performance claims ("fastest", "best") unless tied to a published, reproducible score in your own PoC.
Vendors in this guide
Independent profiles—features, fit notes, and compare-ready data when you are ready to shortlist.
- Guidewire InsuranceSuiteView profile →
- Duck Creek PolicyView profile →
- Insurity PolicyView profile →
- Majesco P&C Core SuiteView profile →
More from this guide— glossary, vendors, related reads
Related glossary terms
Related vendors
Directory profiles with feature context and compare-ready data.
Related articles
Agency Workflow Kpis That Drive Retention
Practical buyer guide for Agency Workflow Kpis That Drive Retention with evaluation criteria, risk checks, and shortlist workflow for P&C teams.
Policy Administration · 14 min read
Best Claims Systems For Catastrophe Response
Practical buyer guide for Best Claims Systems For Catastrophe Response with evaluation criteria, risk checks, and shortlist workflow for P&C teams.
Policy Administration · 14 min read
Claims Triage Design What Goes STP Vs Adjuster
Practical buyer guide for Claims Triage Design What Goes STP Vs Adjuster with evaluation criteria, risk checks, and shortlist workflow for P&C teams.
Policy Administration · 14 min read
Duck Creek Vs Guidewire For Commercial Lines
Practical buyer guide for Duck Creek Vs Guidewire For Commercial Lines with evaluation criteria, risk checks, and shortlist workflow for P&C teams.
Policy Administration · 14 min read
About the author
CoverHolder EditorialResearch & buyer guides
Practitioner-focused guides and definitions for P&C insurance technology buyers. Attribution is organizational until individual bylines are published.
Reference links
URLs attached to this guide in metadata (regulators, vendors, research). Use for diligence—CoverHolder does not endorse third-party sites.
- https://www.guidewire.com
- https://www.duckcreek.com
- https://www.insurity.com
- https://www.naic.org/
- https://content.naic.org/
- https://www.iii.org/
- https://insurancefraud.org/
- https://insurancefraud.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Impact-of-Insurance-Fraud-on-the-U.S.-Economy-Report-2022-8.26.2022-1.pdf
- https://www.majesco.com